The European Social Forum: Sovereign and MultitudeJ.J. King <http://slash.autonomedia.org/article.pl?sid=02/10/16/2028231> ... the question of whether the State should properly be involved in resistance against neo-liberalism is one yet to be answered ... occupation ... of the Porto Alegre Forum by sovereigntist perspectives, and the accompanying disenfranchisement of the non-sovereigntist, horizontally organised political formations that make up the bedrock of today's anti-capital movement, quite simply prevented this question from being properly framed, let alone answered. ... People's Global Action ([4])... producing a parallel space characterised by 'decentralized, horizontal, assembly-based, and anti-authoritarian' principles ... 'a space that would maintain its autonomy with respect to the 'official' space of the ESF, but at the same time remain connected, allowing for [...] intervention.' ... traditional 'centralized' organizations have spokespeople who represent them and can be recognized; networks do not. The movement must solve the question of how to 'represent the unrepresentable' ... ... knowledge sharing, community decision making, possible infrastructures for many-to-many and peer-to-peer communications, and the status of free circulation of information against privacy and security, are critical in this respect ... ... to fight the emergence of the crypto-hierarchies that are troubling the movement at a variety of levels, and to begin to find ways of creating a public decision-making structure that can truly enact the distributed will of the multitude that Negri once spoke of so optimistically. Each and every person still interested in such a process should bring themselves and their ideas to the Ur@ction Hub space during European Social Forum. [10] ... [4] See http://www.agp.org> for a description of the PGA and its hallmarks. ... [10] In order to become part of the formation of this alternative discursive space, see the Ur@action Hub plan at http://www.inventati.org/mailman/listinfo/hub>. Check http://www.inventati.org/hub/calendar/> for the current 'programme'. |
[Gzz] Re: Gradun tutkimusongelmatTuomas Lukka <http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/pipermail/gzz-dev/2002-October/000784.html> ... (kait muuten olet lukenut Schneierin Applied Cryptographyn?) 1. Gzz + Storm + urn-5 + PKIMääritellään seuraavanlainen verkko("X-files -verkko: Trust no-one, the truth is out there"):
d) ... Mitä tehdä, jos allekirjoittaja allekirjoittanut silloin vain vanhalla avaimella? Kaikki allekirjoittamaan nähneensä satunnaisen blokin silloin ja silloin? Revokaation vanhin aika? Notaaripalvelut netissä? Ks. Schneier e) Miten hakukone toimisi? Esim. jos en tiedä Hesarin uusimman etusivun urn-5:sta, haen jollakin tavalla "Helsingin Sanomat" -stringiä. Mistä tiedän, mikä on suht oikea? Todellisessa maailmassa DNS-nimi auttaa. Tässä kuka tahansa voisi tehdä valeblokkeja. Onko ratkaisua? f) Mistä riippuu ja kuinka nopeaa nykyisillä algoritmeilla on etsiä kaikki transkluusiot, jotka viittaavat tiettyihin kohtiin tietyistä blokeista. g) Kuten f), mutta rajaten linkkejä tuttujen ihmisten jollakin tavalla suosittelemiin (collaborative filtering). Tässä siis samaan paikkaan voisi olla hirveästi viitteitä mutta vain pieni osa mielenkiintoisia. h) Kuten f) ja g), mutta Xanadu-linkeille annettujen dokumenttijoukkojen välillä i) Miten allekirjoitukset tulisi varastoida? |
| (That first an-parallel above might be
something for the Unfinished Revolution
(now at OHS-talk,
I think)-crowd of bootstrap.org, Douglas
Engelbart fame, who aim at "global solutions to complex
problems". Just that the side from Xanadu/GZZ (after Ted Nelson, that is) should be translated
from Finnish. Perhaps this could be made an introductory post there .. illustrating/discussing
the sociotechnicality (or has that been gotten over already?) of the matter
(which is of course the whole idea of their work). |
|
| .. draw |
more .. |